GSGame Shelf Open the partner account
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. Nothing about that payment depends on what is written here: these pages contain no ranking, no review and no recommendation of any operator, studio or game, no prediction and no “system”, and no claim that any product is available in your territory. Explaining how a game is supplied, certified and identified is not advice to play it — a game whose build is certified and correctly identified still loses money at its stated rate.
Game Shelf / The figure
Which build, which numbers

The figure in the help panel

Almost every regulated game carries its own rules and its own numbers inside it: a help or information panel, reachable before or during play, stating the paytable, the stake structure and — where the supplier publishes one — the configuration this build runs.

Direct answerThe authoritative statement about the build you are playing is the game\u2019s own help panel, which states its rules, its paytable and any published return or stake information for that version. A supplier may publish more than one configuration of the same title, and the operator chooses which to run, so the figure that applies is the one in that build\u2019s help panel.
Help panel · build identifier · paytable

Where to look, and what you are looking at

Two figures can both be true

A supplier may build more than one configuration of the same title — the same artwork, the same mechanics, different published numbers — and operators choose among them where the market allows. Two lobbies running different configurations of one name are not a contradiction and not a cheat: they are two builds, and each build\u2019s own help panel describes itself.

an illustrative configuration difference: 96.0% against 94.0% published return
on £1,000 of turnover: £960 returned against £940
difference: £20 per £1,000 — about 2% of everything staked
at £1 per spin and 600 spins an hour: turnover £600, difference £12 an hour
the arithmetic of the difference is certain; which of the two you are playing is not knowable until you read the build\u2019s own panel

The figures above are illustrative arithmetic, not a claim about any title, any supplier or any operator\u2019s catalogue. What they show is why the identification step is worth doing once per title rather than guessing from a name: the difference between two configurations is money, and it is invisible unless you read the build.

What the figure does not mean

What a published return figure is, and what it is not
It isIt is not
A statement about the game\u2019s long-run arithmetic, defined for that build.A prediction about your session, which is far too short for a long-run figure to appear in.
A property of the game, not of your account, your stake or your history.A promise about any individual result, which the random process decides independently.
The configuration the operator has chosen to run, where more than one exists.A guarantee about the operator\u2019s conduct, which is a licensing question and a different page.

If you want the mathematics of return, variance and expected loss itself — what the number means and how a session behaves around it — that is a different desk\u2019s subject and is not repeated here. This page is about identification: which artefact you are playing, and where its own statement about itself lives.

Disclosed sponsored link, and the only commercial element on this page. It recommends no title, no supplier and no configuration.

Open the partner account

Where to go next